Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Ugo Humbert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subervi vs Humbert analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Ugo Humbert Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Subervi 1 - 0 Humbert
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subervi has won 49.52% of points on their second serve, while Humbert has won 54.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subervi, in recent form, has won 55.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Humbert has won 52.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.09% and 28.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subervi has saved 54.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Humbert has saved 67.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subervi has won 65.15% of matches played (W/L 43/ 23), with Humbert winning 65.22% (W/L 45/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 122/ 84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Humbert has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 137/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 47/ 50).
- Player level: In the last year, Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12), where as Humbert has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72.5% of matches (W/L 29/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Subervi winning 1 times and Humbert being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Humbert winning 1. The last match between Subervi and Humbert was at the Leon Challenger, 26-04-2018, Second, Hard with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subervi and Humbert have played a deciding set 1 times, with Subervi winning 1 times and Humbert 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Subervi winning 0, and Humbert 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subervi has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.61 while Humbert has played against players with an average rank of 111.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subervi has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Humbert has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subervi has converted 45.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Humbert has converted 37.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
444
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
16
Rank
13
High
26
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
57% (282-212)
Career Total W/L
61% (325-206)
63% (25-15)
YTD W/L
62% (21-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,611,750
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Roberto Cid Subervi vs Ugo Humbert For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Subervi VS Humbert
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Ugo Humbert |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:19 | 1:36:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (50/74) | 57% (44/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (34/50) | 75% (33/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (14/24) | 36% (12/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (32/77) | 35% (26/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ugo Humbert
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Ugo Humbert |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (25/15) | 62% (21/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (54/38) | 59% (52/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (467/385) | 54% (452/388) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 186 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:31 | 1:53:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 270.35 | 111.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1810/2648) | 66% (1711/2608) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1210/1810) | 72% (1229/1711) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (415/838) | 55% (492/897) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (143/312) | 38% (92/243) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1140/2664) | 38% (982/2607) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 74% (17/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (25/40) | 63% (19/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 50% (6/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (25/22) | 75% (20/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (25/3) | 25% (20/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 43% (14/6) |
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
48
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Adria Soriano Barrera
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
0
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
84 of
118)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
60 of
84)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
27 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taha Baadi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Luis Carlos Alvarez Valdes
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Christopher Bulus
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Ugo Humbert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Ugo Humbert
71%
(
67 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Ugo Humbert
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
9
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Gijs Brouwer
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Ugo Humbert
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Arthur Fils
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Ugo Humbert
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Ugo Humbert
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Ugo Humbert
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ugo Humbert
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Subervi Vs Humbert Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Subervi are available here and Humbert photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ugo Humbert
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
